The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(primes) → mark(sieve(from(s(s(0)))))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(head(cons(X, Y))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, Y))) → mark(Y)
active(if(true, X, Y)) → mark(X)
active(if(false, X, Y)) → mark(Y)
active(filter(s(s(X)), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(if(divides(s(s(X)), Y), filter(s(s(X)), Z), cons(Y, filter(X, sieve(Y)))))
active(sieve(cons(X, Y))) → mark(cons(X, filter(X, sieve(Y))))
active(sieve(X)) → sieve(active(X))
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
active(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(active(X1), X2, X3)
active(filter(X1, X2)) → filter(active(X1), X2)
active(filter(X1, X2)) → filter(X1, active(X2))
active(divides(X1, X2)) → divides(active(X1), X2)
active(divides(X1, X2)) → divides(X1, active(X2))
sieve(mark(X)) → mark(sieve(X))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
if(mark(X1), X2, X3) → mark(if(X1, X2, X3))
filter(mark(X1), X2) → mark(filter(X1, X2))
filter(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(filter(X1, X2))
divides(mark(X1), X2) → mark(divides(X1, X2))
divides(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(divides(X1, X2))
proper(primes) → ok(primes)
proper(sieve(X)) → sieve(proper(X))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
proper(if(X1, X2, X3)) → if(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(true) → ok(true)
proper(false) → ok(false)
proper(filter(X1, X2)) → filter(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(divides(X1, X2)) → divides(proper(X1), proper(X2))
sieve(ok(X)) → ok(sieve(X))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
if(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(if(X1, X2, X3))
filter(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(filter(X1, X2))
divides(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(divides(X1, X2))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
sieve(mark(X)) →⁺ mark(sieve(X))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0].
The pumping substitution is [X / mark(X)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)